Unlock New Opportunities for Thought Leadership with SB Webinars

Carbon Divestment Is No Financial Risk, Study Finds

Divesting from fossil fuel companies does not incur additional portfolio risk, according to a new report by Aperio Group.

Divesting from fossil fuel companies does not incur additional portfolio risk, according to a new report by Aperio Group.

The financial advisory firm conducted two studies to analyze the impact of divesting from the Filthy Fifteen, a group of coal utility and extraction companies designated by the university Coal Divestment Campaign as the dirtiest public companies to hold, and the exclusion of the entire industry of Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels.

Do the Investment Math: Building a Carbon-Free Portfolio finds the impact of removing all of the Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels industry results in forecasted tracking error versus the Russell 3000 of only 0.60%, which adds incremental portfolio risk of 0.01%. The more narrow divestment of just the Filthy Fifteen results in a tracking error of only 0.14% with an incremental risk of 0.0006%.

Aperio Group CIO Patrick Geddes says the tracking error can be converted to incremental portfolio risk to give investors a more accurate measurement of the impact upon a portfolio. "The portfolio becomes riskier by such a trivial amount that the impact is statistically irrelevant. In other words, excluding the Filthy Fifteen has no real impact on risk," Geddes says. "The impact of screening for coal and carbon is far less significant than skeptics often presume. Anyone on an endowment board facing that decision should do the investment math."

The study comes as students and university community members on campuses across the country increase pressure on academic institution to invest responsibly and diminish the financial power of the coal industry in the U.S.

According to Dan Apfel of the Responsible Endowments Coalition, "This report answers the critical question that students and university endowments have been asking: ‘Can we divest from fossil fuels without incurring additional risk?’ Now we have the math to prove that carbon divestment is not just good for people and planet, but has no impact on risk or profit."

In related news, impact investing is expected to grow more than 12 percent in 2013 as more investors begin to seek environmental and social performance alongside financial returns.

@Bart_King is a freelance writer and communications consultant.

Upcoming Events

October 13-16, 2025
SB'25 San Diego
US Event
More Information

Monday, December 9, 2024
OK - Now What?: Navigating the Shifting Landscape for Corporate Sustainability After the 2024 US Presidential Election
Webinar
More Information

December 11-12, 2024
SB Member Network: Shifting Customer Behavior and Demand December Member Meeting
Member Event
Sponsored by Amazon
More Information

Related Stories

What ESG Backlash? Investors Staying the Course on Sustainability, Human Rights FINANCE & INVESTMENT
What ESG Backlash? Investors Staying the Course on Sustainability, Human Rights
Charting a Clear Path Forward on Corporate Use of Carbon Credits FINANCE & INVESTMENT
Charting a Clear Path Forward on Corporate Use of Carbon Credits
Corporate Giants See $5T Benefit in Climate Action, Doubling Previous Estimates FINANCE & INVESTMENT
Corporate Giants See $5T Benefit in Climate Action, Doubling Previous Estimates
First US Nature-Based Carbon Credit Auction Coming in 2025 FINANCE & INVESTMENT
First US Nature-Based Carbon Credit Auction Coming in 2025
If People Are Hungry, Their Pets Are, Too FINANCE & INVESTMENT
If People Are Hungry, Their Pets Are, Too
New ‘Climate Label’ Requires Companies to Invest in Climate Solutions MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS
New ‘Climate Label’ Requires Companies to Invest in Climate Solutions