BP Energy Outlook 2019: Renewables to become largest source of global power generation by 2040
The 2019 edition of BP’s Energy Outlook, released Thursday, explores
the key uncertainties that could impact the shape of global energy markets
out to 2040 — the greatest of which involve the dual challenges of the need
for more energy to support continued global economic growth and rising
prosperity, and the need for a more rapid transition to a lower-carbon
future. The Outlook also considers a number of other issues, including the
possible impact of an escalation in trade disputes and the implications of a
significant tightening in the regulation of
plastics.
Much of the narrative in the Outlook is based on its ‘evolving
transition’ scenario. This scenario and the others considered in the
Outlook are not predictions of what is likely to happen; instead, BP says
they explore the possible implications of different judgements and
assumptions.
In the evolving transition scenario — which assumes that government
policies, technologies and societal preferences evolve in a manner and speed
similar to the recent past:
-
Global energy demand increases by around a third by 2040, driven by
improvements in living standards, particularly in India, China and
across Asia.
-
Energy consumed by industry and buildings accounts for around 75 percent
of this increase in overall energy demand, while growth in energy demand
from transport slows sharply relative to the past as gains in vehicle
efficiency accelerate.
-
The power sector uses around 75 percent of the increase in primary
energy.
-
85 percent of the growth in energy supply is generated through renewable
energy and natural gas, with renewables becoming the largest source of
global power generation by 2040.
-
The pace at which renewable energy penetrates the global energy system is
faster than for any fuel in history.
-
Demand for oil grows in the first half of the Outlook period before
gradually plateauing, while global coal consumption remains broadly flat.
Across all the scenarios considered in the Outlook, significant levels of
continued investment in new oil will be required to meet oil demand in 2040.
-
Global carbon emissions continue to rise, signalling the need for a
comprehensive set of policy
measures
to achieve a substantial reduction in carbon emissions.
“The Outlook again brings into sharp focus just how fast the world’s energy
systems are changing, and how the dual challenge of more energy with fewer
emissions is framing the future. Meeting this challenge will undoubtedly
require many forms of energy to play a role,” said Bob Dudley, group chief
executive at BP. “Predicting how this energy transition will evolve is a
vast, complex challenge. In BP, we know the outcome that’s needed, but we
don’t know the exact path the transition will take. Our strategy offers us
the flexibility and agility we need to meet this uncertainty head on.”
Beyond the evolving transition scenario, the Outlook considers a number of
additional scenarios, including:
More energy
More energy will be needed to support growth and enable billions of people
to move from low to middle incomes. The increase in energy required over and
above the evolving transition scenario is roughly the equivalent of China’s
entire energy consumption in 2017.
Along with this projection, the Outlook also highlights the need for further
action to reduce carbon emissions.
Rapid transition
The rapid transition scenario is the combination of analyses throughout the
Outlook that brings together in a single scenario the policy measures in
separate, lower-carbon scenarios for industry and buildings, transport and
power. Doing so results in around a 45 percent decline in carbon emissions
by 2040 relative to current levels — which is broadly in the middle of a
sample of external projections that claim to be consistent with meeting the
Paris climate goals.
This fall reflects a combination of gains in energy efficiency; a switch
to lower-carbon fuels; material use of carbon capture, utilization and
storage (CCUS); and, of particular importance in the power sector, a
significant rise in the carbon
price.
The power sector is the single largest source of carbon emissions from
energy use;
reductions in carbon emissions from the transport industry in all scenarios
to 2040 is relatively small in comparison.
“Polices aimed at the power sector are central to achieving a material
reduction in carbon emissions over the next 20 years,” said Spencer
Dale, group chief economist. “Most of the low-hanging fruit in terms of
reducing carbon emissions is outside of the transport sector.”
Even in the rapid transition scenario, a significant level of carbon
emissions remains in 2040. In order to meet the Paris climate goals, in the
second half of the century these remaining emissions would need to be
greatly reduced and offset with negative emissions. This year’s Outlook
considers which technologies and developments may play a central role in
this reduction beyond 2040.
A key development would be a near-complete decarbonization of the power
sector — requiring greater use of renewables and CCUS in conjunction with
natural gas — together with greater electrification of end-use activities
(including transport). For those end-uses that cannot be electrified, other
forms of low-carbon energy and energy carriers will be crucial, potentially
including hydrogen and bioenergy. Additionally, the importance of the
circular economy and greater adoption of carbon storage and removal
techniques are highlighted.
Less globalization
International trade underpins economic growth and allows countries to
diversify their source of energy. In the less globalization scenario, the
Outlook explores the possible impact that escalating trade disputes could
have on the global energy system.
“The message from history is that concerns about energy security can have
persistent, scarring effects,” Dale said.
The scenario highlights how a reduction in openness and trade associated
with an escalation in trade disputes could reduce worldwide GDP and
therefore energy demand. Moreover, increasing concerns about energy security
may cause countries to favour domestically produced energy, leading to a
sharp reduction in energy trade. The greatest impact is on net energy
exporters, who suffer a material slowdown in the growth of oil and gas
exports.
Single-use plastics ban
The single-largest projected source of oil demand growth over the next 20
years is from the non- combusted use of liquid fuels in industry,
particularly as a feedstock for petrochemicals, driven by the increasing
production of plastics. Growth of non-combusted demand in the evolving
transition scenario is, however, slower than in the past, reflecting the
assumption that regulations governing the use and recycling of plastics
tighten significantly over the next 20 years.
Given the heightening environmental concerns regarding single-use plastics,
the Outlook also considers a single-use plastics ban scenario, culminating
in a worldwide ban on the use of all single-use plastics from 2040 onwards.
In this scenario, oil demand rises more slowly than in the evolving
transition scenario. However, the Outlook cautions that the full impact on
energy growth and the environment will depend on the alternative materials
that may be used in place of single-use plastics. BP asserts that a ban on
single-use plastics could result in an increase in energy demand and carbon
emissions without further advances in alternative
materials
and infrastructure for collection and reuse.
Carbon Clean 200 outperformed the S&P Global 1200 Energy Index
Meanwhile, signs of the impending shift toward a clean energy future continue,
as As You Sow and Corporate Knights today release their sixth update of the
Carbon Clean 200™, which
calls out the 200 publicly traded companies leading the way.
Key findings include:
-
The Clean200 outperformed the S&P Global 1200 Energy Index with a return
of 1.29 percent; it lagged behind the broad-market benchmark for the S&P
1200, mostly due to the impact of the simmering trade war between China and
the US.
-
If Chinese stocks are excluded from the Clean200, its return since
implementation jumps to 20.4 percent.
-
The top 10 Clean200 companies — based on their amount of absolute
revenue from low-carbon products and services for the second half of 2018,
and using an updated methodology — are, in order:
-
Alphabet Inc
-
Siemens AG
-
Toyota Motor Corporation
-
Cisco Systems
-
HP
-
Taiwan Semiconductor
-
Abb Ltd
-
Ericsson
-
Unilever
-
Banco Do Brasil S.A.
Since its inception in July 2016, the Clean200™ has outperformed the S&P Global
1200 Energy Index with a return of 1.29 percent, compared to -2.49 percent. It
currently lags behind the broad-market benchmark for the S&P 1200, which had a
return of 19.67 percent, mostly due to the simmering trade war between China and
the US.
If Chinese stocks are excluded from the Clean200, its return since
implementation jumps to 20.4 percent, moving it ahead of the broad-market
benchmark, as well (which has almost no
exposure — 1.7 percent
— to Chinese stocks). The Clean200 therefore continues to demonstrate that
market forces are driving growth for low-carbon companies across all sectors of
the economy.
It is not surprising that the low-carbon leaders from China faltered, as Chinese
stocks had their worst year in a
decade.
While stock markets suffered losses across the board last year, the Shanghai
composite (Mainland China's primary market indicator) lost 24.6 percent of its
value, and the Shenzhen composite plummeted 33.25 percent.
“Normally, during periods of stock market decline, defensive stocks outperform
and higher growth stocks underperform,” said Toby Heaps, CEO of Corporate
Knights and co-author of the report. “The Clean200 is overweight on growth
companies and underweight on defensive stocks, with no exposure to weapons,
tobacco or healthcare. But it has still continued to outperform when the
outlying Chinese stocks are excluded. This suggests markets are re-calibrating
the value of stocks such as clean energy, that offer a superior and enduring
value proposition in a low-carbon economy.”
The Clean200 methodology was updated this year — using the Corporate Knights
Clean Revenue database — to capture portions of the clean economy extending
beyond energy efficiency, green energy, and zero emission and hybrid vehicles.
The companies assessed now include:
-
banks financing low-carbon solutions;
-
real estate companies focused on low-carbon buildings;
-
forestry companies protecting carbon sinks;
-
responsible miners of critical materials for the low-carbon economy;
-
food and apparel companies with products primarily made of raw materials
with a significantly lower carbon footprint; and
-
Information and Communications Technology (ICT) companies that are leading
the way on renewable energy while also being best-in-sector, according to
currently accepted privacy benchmarks.
This resulted in a relatively high turnover, with 87 new companies added
from the last update on July 1, 2018.
The company topping the 2019 Q1 Carbon Clean 200 list is from within this
expanded sectoral coverage. Alphabet, the holding company for Google, has
invested billions of dollars over the past few years to meet its 100 percent
renewable energy target, and is ranked the cleanest-of-the-clean on this basis.
“It matters a lot what kind of energy ICT companies choose because they are
projected to account for 20 percent of global electricity consumption by 2025,”
said Andrew Behar, CEO of As You Sow and report co-author. “The carbon
impact of Google going 100 percent renewable is equivalent to taking one million
cars off the road, permanently. We challenge all ICT companies to do the same
and to focus on the privacy issues which have become a threat to their business
model.”
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sustainable Brands Staff
Published Feb 18, 2019 7pm EST / 4pm PST / 12am GMT / 1am CET