Unlock New Opportunities for Thought Leadership with SB Webinars

Meaningful Supplier Partnerships Are Critical in Era of Human Rights Due Diligence

Key takeaways from day two of the UN Forum on Business and Human Rights 2024 included viewing impacted communities as ‘rights-holders’ — not stakeholders — to help bridge the power imbalance between larger, Global North companies and their Global South supply chain partners.

What is the common rejoinder in considering the quality of company sustainability reporting, of human rights due diligence and of purposeful business?

Each time, the answer comes back as effective stakeholder relations — in essence, not making judgments about your company’s impact on people, without asking people themselves.

In the past, business often equated this as engagement with non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and the key challenge for a company was how brave to be in addressing the most critical voices amongst the NGOs.

The old criticism was that companies would choose 'soft' stakeholders or even connive in establishing 'phantom' NGOs, to take the place of genuine stakeholder interests.

Day two of this year's UN Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights in Geneva heard that the new era of human rights due diligence introduces some very different challenges.

New challenges

The first requirement of business today is to identify: Who are the communities affected by the business? There can be no assumption that NGOs necessarily speak for people actually impacted by the company.

This is not to delegitimize NGOs, but to recognise that a company's obligation is to undertake a human rights impact assessment to identify who is affected and how they can best be engaged.

"In identifying who are stakeholders, another question is, what is their stake? Research shows many stakeholders today are dispensable," Tom Thomas, CEO of India's Praxis Institute for Participatory Practices, told the Forum.

Much of the discussion centered on how to bridge the power imbalance between larger, Global North companies and stakeholders of companies in their global value chain. Speakers emphasized that the challenge wasn't just one of a mismatch of resources, but of also of knowledge.

"What is the knowledge which the community can bring to the table?" asked Danielle Pamplona, Professor at Brazil's Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. "It is the community which should be defining what it means to create a better life.”

Focusing on local context doesn't have to be a way of diluting international standards but maximising impact in how they are applied. Speakers agreed that capacity building should be as much about the way larger companies talk to communities as about the capacity in local communities themselves.

Supplier companies

But the stakeholders who arguably need the greatest attention are supplier companies in corporate value chains.

Jenny Holdcroft, Deputy Director at the center of expertise on business and human rights at the Shift Project, shared insights gained from interviewing suppliers in Bangladesh, Kenya, Tanzania and Thailand. The almost-uniform response was that producers felt that they were not being given support by buyers and were reluctant to share information, as they felt it would only lead to their company being penalised.

Government representatives from Germany and Netherlands insisted that due diligence law should not be used by companies to disengage and should lead to higher prices for Global South suppliers. Pakistani and Nigerian representatives highlighted how their national action plans on business and human rights helped provide a Global South perspective on how due diligence can be conducted.

A further positive example was given by Jhumki Dutta, Project Manager at Partners in Change in New Delhi — part of the Southern Voice network, whose mission is to rebalance knowledge asymmetry. She described how most micro-, small and medium-sized businesses (MSMEs) in Indian states are not even registered with local governments — their presence in the informal economy effectively preventing them from taking part in partnerships to address human rights.

The project had sought to overcome the challenge by creating clusters of MSMEs, giving them recognition, demonstrating very practical financial benefits by sharing together in transportation costs and creating far greater negotiating power to win better prices and contract terms from purchasing companies.

The power of partnership

The ability for companies to achieve a genuine balance of power through partnerships with stakeholders was also explored by Kathrin Raabe, Senior Manager of Corporate Responsibility at German retail chain Aldi Süd.

Raabe explained how the company had set up a remediation process in conjunction with the Centre for Child Rights and Business and had joined multi-stakeholder initiatives to promote access to remedy in Thailand and living wages in the banana supply chain, and to combat gender-based violence with African countries.

Perhaps it is not a tautology to say that stakeholders are the key to stakeholders? Moreover, the retailer could hardly be accused of evading the most difficult issues.

Raabe said that the effectiveness of Aldi Süd’s stakeholder relations had been forged by nine years' of undertaking human rights impact assessments, which she said due diligence legislation now means "thousands of companies" will follow.

Levelling up

It was the call for a "level playing field,” often heard from business regarding the need for consistency in regulation on due diligence, which Forum members said most of all needs to apply to power relations between companies and their stakeholders.

Raabe suggested this is best achieved by continuous and open dialogue with stakeholders. Pamplona said companies could only "get the facts right" by "starting by going first to rights-holders at the bottom."

Dutta put the emphasis on enabling SMEs "to be active partners” — calling on purchasing companies to "develop a worker- and community-centric architecture, which takes account first and foremost of the local context.”

Note: “Rights-holders,” not stakeholders. Building from “bottom up.” Being willing to genuinely listen and enabling stakeholders to set their own agenda.

These represent the meaning in "meaningful engagement” — the new challenge in stakeholder relations for companies in the era of human rights due diligence.

Upcoming Events

October 13-16, 2025
SB'25 San Diego
US Event
More Information

Thursday, December 5, 2024
Circularity by Design: How to Influence Sustainable Consumer Behaviors
Webinar
Sponsored by Sustainable Brands
More Information

Monday, December 9, 2024
OK - Now What?: Navigating the Shifting Landscape for Corporate Sustainability After the 2024 US Presidential Election
Webinar
More Information

Related Stories

What ESG Backlash? Investors Staying the Course on Sustainability, Human Rights FINANCE & INVESTMENT
What ESG Backlash? Investors Staying the Course on Sustainability, Human Rights
Voluntary vs Mandatory Human Rights Action: Is There a 'Smart Mix'? SUPPLY CHAIN
Voluntary vs Mandatory Human Rights Action: Is There a 'Smart Mix'?
REI’s New Approach to Sizing, Design Raises Bar for Outdoor Industry Inclusion ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
REI’s New Approach to Sizing, Design Raises Bar for Outdoor Industry Inclusion
Kindergarten Lunch Program Improves Child Nutrition in Vietnam ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
Kindergarten Lunch Program Improves Child Nutrition in Vietnam
DEI, Sustainability Teams Are Linchpins of Future-Proof Organizations ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
DEI, Sustainability Teams Are Linchpins of Future-Proof Organizations
Why Purpose-Driven Companies Should Focus on Their Hybrid Work Culture ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
Why Purpose-Driven Companies Should Focus on Their Hybrid Work Culture