2019 will rank as one of the top five warmest years in history, with an 85
percent
chance
of coming in second-hottest. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
warned last year that we must start reducing emissions significantly before
2030,
to avoid the most devastating impacts of climate change, still to come. The
youth climate
movement,
led by the very people who will bear the brunt of prior generations’ decisions,
has intensified to such an extent that one of its leaders, 16 year-old Greta
Thunberg, was named Time magazine’s Person of the
Year.
Despite this momentum, the COP25 climate negotiations, which came to a close
last week in Madrid, were widely seen to have ended in
disappointment.
Why?
Stepping back — in 2015, at COP21, 197 countries committed to the Paris Climate
Agreement,
under the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change. In doing so,
countries agreed to increase their efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C
above pre-industrial temperatures. The largest emitters made “nationally
determined contributions” to reduce emissions, with the expectation that they
would increase their ambition with new commitments in 2020.
Nevertheless, at this last COP before the critical 2020 deadline, countries
failed to make
progress.
The talks were marked by several
failures —
including an inability to resolve long-running tensions over who should bear
financial responsibility for climate mitigation and adaptation, as well as a
breakdown in discussions over a global carbon
market.
Moreover, countries failed to commit to increasing their ambitions next year
(matters were certainly not helped by the lack of US leadership, as the current
administration withdraws from the Paris
Agreement).
The final text copped to the COP’s dashed expectations, reflecting:
“... with
serious concern the urgent need to address the significant gap between the
aggregate effect of Parties’ mitigation efforts in terms of global annual
emissions of greenhouse gases by 2020 and aggregate emission pathways consistent
with holding the increase in global average temperatures to well below 2DC above
pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to
1.5DC above pre-industrial levels.”
A few wins
But all was not completely lost at COP25. With the announcement of the European
Green
Deal,
the EU continues its leadership on climate ambition. The EU proposes to lead
both through a commitment to climate neutrality by 2050 and by proposing to
increase the EU’s Paris Agreement target to a 55 percent reduction below 1990
levels by 2030, with the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) as the cornerstone
policy for delivering on this ambition.
In addition, 73 nations announced that they will submit enhanced climate action
plan (or Nationally Determined Contribution). 14 regions, 398 cities, 786
businesses and 16 investors are working towards achieving net-zero CO2 emissions
by 2050. Small island
states
together committed to achieve carbon neutrality and to move to 100 percent
renewable energy by 2030. And countries from Pakistan to Guatemala,
Colombia to Nigeria, and New Zealand to Barbados vowed to plant
more than 11 billion trees.
Business takes a stand
While governments could not collectively reach a meaningful agreement, what’s
clear is that the business community, along with states and cities, plays an
ever more important role in tackling the climate crisis.
As an example, Michael Bloomberg announced the Accelerating America’s
Pledge
report at COP25. America’s Pledge is a coalition of states, cities and
businesses committed to the Paris Agreement. Together, the coalition represents
68 percent of the US GDP — if it were an independent country, it would be the
world’s second-largest — and 51 percent of US GHG emissions. As the report
notes, this coalition’s current climate commitments are on target to reduce US
climate emissions by 25 percent by 2030. If this coalition amplifies its efforts
— through decarbonizing electricity supply and energy end use and with
nature-based climate solutions — it has the potential to reduce US emissions 37
percent by 2030. That’s not enough to keep global temperatures from exceeding
the 1.5-degree limit by mid-century, but it demonstrates just how far the US can
go even without federal action.
Also announced at COP, 177 companies — a group that has doubled in size since
September
— have signed the Business Ambition for 1.5°C Our Only Future campaign,
committing to set targets aligned with the 1.5-degree limit through the Science
Based Targets
initiative.
Business targets, if fully implemented, will make a significant impact. Assuming
momentum continues to grow and 2,000 companies adopt science-based targets by
2030 in line with a 2°C goal, these companies may reduce GHG emissions by 2.7
GtCO2e per year. If 2,000 companies commit to sourcing 100 percent of their
electricity from renewable sources by 2030 through the
RE100 initiative, GHG emissions may go down by 1.9. to
4.0 GtCO2e per year.
We need to take matters in our own hands
COP25 dramatically illustrates the ever-widening gap between science and citizen
demands, on the one hand, and what the United Nations can deliver. For better or
worse, we will need to continue driving bottom-up action and commitment. This
starts with individuals, communities, cities and states — and just as
critically, the business community, which continues to show what’s possible in
reducing emissions as it comes to terms with the financial impacts of climate
risks.
Let’s hope COP26 follows where the business community leads.
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Associate Director
Cory Weiss is an Associate Director at Anthesis Group, a global sustainability consultancy with over 500 consultants worldwide that work with large-scale enterprises to help them become more sustainable.
Published Dec 20, 2019 7am EST / 4am PST / 12pm GMT / 1pm CET