Sustainability reporting focuses on the challenges that most affect business performance and matter most to key stakeholders. From understanding consumption and cost of inefficiencies and anomalies, clear reporting is mission critical to any organization’s ability to meet sustainability goals.
But sustainability reports are only as impactful as the quality of the data that is being used. If the data driving your reports is incomplete or inaccurate, you could be compromising the nature of your assessments. Just like the quality of soil is important for the growth of a tree, the quality of your data is just as important for growing your sustainability programs.
Sustainability reporting focuses on the challenges that most affect business performance and matter most to key stakeholders. From understanding consumption and cost of inefficiencies and anomalies, clear reporting is mission critical to any organization’s ability to meet sustainability goals.
But sustainability reports are only as impactful as the quality of the data that is being used. If the data driving your reports is incomplete or inaccurate, you could be compromising the nature of your assessments. Just like the quality of soil is important for the growth of a tree, the quality of your data is just as important for growing your sustainability programs.
In 2016, for example, Rainforest Action Network (RAN) published a report alleging it found many Japanese companies were either “systematically misreporting compliance” under Japan’s Corporate Governance Code or had a “fundamental lack of understanding as to what constitutes meaningful sustainability reporting and stakeholder engagement.”
Japan introduced a Corporate Governance Code intended to increase transparency and oversight related to ESG performance back in 2015. To evaluate the implementation, RAN reviewed the Code reports of 10 major Japanese companies with known links to tropical deforestation and associated risks through their supply chains — only to find that none of the companies were sufficiently disclosing their risks.
A New Era for Brand Integrity: Navigating the Greenhush-Greenwash Spectrum
Join us as leaders from Republik, NielsenIQ, Conspirators, Henoscene, be/co, The Guardian and Room & Board analyze what newly expanded notions of brand integrity mean for brands, and how to be smarter about picking language choices that avoid the dangerous extremes of greenhushing and greenwashing — Thurs, May 9, at Brand-Led Culture Change.
The full report from RAN exposed lack of progress in how companies were addressing ESG issues. And while companies were reporting on ESG measures, their reports all varied in quality. While this is a large-scale example of the cost of bad data, any business, regardless of size, could run into major issues with sustainability reporting due to poor quality data.
To help your business understand the importance of ensuring data quality for your sustainability reporting efforts, Urjanet, Measurabl, and Shorenstein have joined forces to outline best practices for ensuring data quality in their webinar on April 20th at 2pm EST.
- Defining data quality
- When, where, and how to collect reliable, accurate data
- Real world examples of the impact driven by good — and bad — data quality
Experts from Urjanet, the global leader in automated utility data aggregation; Measurabl, provider of precision software built to help you collect, report and act upon non-financial data; and Shorenstein, one of the country's oldest and most respected real estate organizations, will walk you through the critical steps it takes to unleash the power of quality sustainability data. Register now for the event to save your seat.
Published Apr 4, 2018 1pm EDT / 10am PDT / 6pm BST / 7pm CEST