New research from Ecosystem Marketplace
(EM) — an initiative of the non-profit Forest
Trends that offers a global source of
information on environmental
finance,
markets and payments for ecosystem
services
— shows a new phase for the voluntary carbon
market
(VCM), shaped by a greater focus on quality and integrity and lower levels
of market liquidity, as measured in carbon credit volumes traded.
The report finds that though transaction volumes fell by 25 percent in 2024,
credit prices declined by only 5.5 percent and credit
retirements
(credits are retired once the carbon benefit they represent has been
claimed by the entity that bought them, to prevent double counting) held steady
— indicating that underlying demand remains resilient even amid broader market
pressures.
Building trust, credibility
The past few years have been rocky for the VCM — after being built by four
independent registries and thousands of independent project developers left to
self-regulate, its
efficacy and credibility
were called into question after carbon
offsetting
became a cornerstone of many corporate climate-action
plans,
and several well-known offset verifiers’ standards came under the
microscope
in 2023. EM analysts say the market is undergoing a significant supply-side
reboot in response to increasingly sophisticated buyers demanding project
transparency and quality.
The evolution of the VCM is not without its challenges, as policy and integrity
frameworks developed in recent years will take time to operationalize. Still,
these developments are widely viewed as positive steps toward a more credible
and higher-quality
marketplace.
“We’re seeing a winding down of a legacy market from older methodologies, and
the scaling up of a new phase of the VCM,” says Charlotte
Barber, Forest Trends’
Associate Director of the Ecosystem Marketplace. “While supply from new project
types takes time to ramp up to meet the needs and demand of this new phase,
end-user demand is staying steady — with credit retirements holding steady and
increasing demand for some trusted project types.”
Other key findings from the report include:
-
The volume of credits retired (an indicator of end-user demand) from the 10
largest standards has plateaued at an elevated level since 2021, with 182
million tons of credits retired in 2024.
-
2024 posted the lowest transaction volume since 2018, but market value is
1.9x higher than 2018 — on the strength of relatively buoyant credit prices.
-
On average, credits representing emissions removals (which come from
actions that remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and store them,
such as through reforestation
projects
or direct air
capture)
were 381 percent more expensive than those for emissions reduction
(which prevent or reduce emissions compared to the status quo, including
projects that improve fuel efficiency or protect forests at risk of
destruction)
in 2024 — up from 245 percent in 2023.
-
Buyer preference for credits from recent
vintages
(referring to the period in which the carbon avoidance or removal occurred)
reached unprecedented levels. There was a 217 percent premium for credits
with vintage from the last five years, compared to a 53 percent premium in
2023.
-
While the effect of the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon
Market (ICVCM)’s Core Carbon
Principles (CCPs) on the
market was relatively minimal — since ICVCM only approved a small number of
project
types
in 2024, and the effect on transaction volume was isolated to project types
with existing supply in 2024 — the CCPs are beginning to affect market
demand. In market segments where CCP-approved
credits were
available to buyers, transaction volumes and prices were markedly higher:
- Waste-disposal transactions grew over 3x, driven by
demand for CCP-approved Landfill Gas
credits — the average price of
which increased by 35 percent from the first half of the year to the
second half of the year (following ICVCM approval), with 3.1M credits
traded.
“Long have reports on the death of carbon markets been exaggerated. This is a
market that goes through lots of ups and downs; we have seen our share of cycles
of rapid growth, decline, rapid growth. This year is a down year. But for those
who are paying attention, that decline is only around the ‘loosely rational
exuberance’ that surrounds this market,” says Ricardo Bayon, Partner and
Co-founder of Encourage Capital. “The underlying fundamental indicator of
demand, the retirements, continue to grow. So, the market continues to grow; and
I believe it will once again boom when issues of trust and integrity are dealt
with — and they are being dealt with.”
“There is certainly a shortage of the types of higher-integrity credits that
companies are increasingly demanding, and this is one of the key contributors to
lower trading volumes. We expect to see significant increases in volumes traded
as forest countries bring these to market and sign agreements with Emergent and
other buyers,” says Eron
Bloomgarden, CEO of
Emergent — whose LEAF
Coalition aims to halt tropical
deforestation by financing large-scale protection projects by 2030. “But
high-integrity supply alone will not scale the market to where we need to be to
tackle the climate crisis. More work is still needed on the demand side —
working with companies to build stronger business cases, and standard setters to
ensure they send a clearer signal that compensation for emissions via removals
and reductions is vital for the millions of tonnes of carbon companies will
continue to emit as they progress towards net zero.”
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sustainable Brands Staff
Published May 29, 2025 8am EDT / 5am PDT / 1pm BST / 2pm CEST