Published 7 years ago.
About a 4 minute read.
My family eats a mostly vegetarian diet. Some kids at school were making fun of my 9-year-old son, telling him how great meat tastes. Before diving into the challenge of dealing with childhood peers, I asked him if he knew why we’re vegetarian. When it was clear he didn’t (that’s on me), I started to tell him about the environmental impacts of meat as it’s currently produced, health benefits, and animal welfare.
Then he asked the big question: “But there’s only 4 of us, so what difference does it make if we’re vegetarian?” Before I get to my answer, let me say that I’ve faced similar questions many times, and at all scales:
This last one is shockingly common and one of the big, crumbling myths on tackling climate change. Before leaving the presidential race, Senator Rubio said the U.S. shouldn’t reduce carbon emissions because China and India will still pollute. And, he added, "America is not a planet. It's a country."
Even without the dated views on what other countries are doing (China spends way more than we do on clean energy), we can dismiss the country-level question because it’s, well, ridiculous…especially for the U.S. When you use or produce 25 to 50% of anything – be it carbon emissions, food, weapons, or rubber duckies – what you do matters.
Unlock customer insights on sustainability & your brand’s unique performance! Submit your brand (or any brand) into the 2024 annual study and receive unparalleled insights on customer perception of that brand’s performance. Benchmark how your customers rate your brand on social and environmental sustainability and overall brand trust, while seeing how your brand compares to others in the study. Space is limited! The deadline to become part of the study is January 15, 2024.
The company-level question is only marginally better. For small companies, it’s a concern. But I hear this question from people at mostly very large companies. And what they do in their own operations, or what they ask of suppliers, does in fact matter very much (and creates real value for the business anyway). But that said, it is true that, in order to tackle systemic problems, even the largest companies need to collaborate (sometimes radically and pre-competitively as I wrote about last week). Still, one large company can drive enormous change.
So the real challenge here is the question about individuals.
With more than 7 billion people on the planet, of course each choice we make – about what to do with our time, our money, our consumption, and our vote – doesn’t technically matter. It’s a drop in the ocean. But at the same time, of course each choice matters – it’s the only thing that does. (*Cue the the Margaret Mead or Dalai Lama quotes on changing the world).
Bottom line: If your choices don’t have an impact, do you? Why even get out of bed?
So I told my 9-year-old son that yes, we’re only 4 people making the best choices we can…but along with millions of our friends, our choices make a very real difference. My son said, “But we don’t have millions of friends.”
Yes, I told him, yes we do.
*Quotes on change:
Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”
Dalai Lama: “If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping with a mosquito.”
Bob Moawad: “You can't make footprints in the sands of time by sitting on your butt. And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time?”
This article was previously published on Andrew Winston's blog on March 30, 2016.
Published Apr 1, 2016 11am EDT / 8am PDT / 4pm BST / 5pm CEST
Andrew Winston, founder of Winston Eco-Strategies, is a globally recognized expert on how companies can profit from solving the world’s biggest challenges.