Global meat giants such as Brazil’s JBS and India’s Venky’s,
both suppliers to household names such as McDonald’s, are among 44 firms
highlighted by investors for their inability to prevent the emergence of new
zoonotic diseases. The report highlights seafood as a lower-risk alternative;
and points to a boom in sales that sees plant-based meat alternatives well
positioned to win market share, as animal agriculture struggles to implement
costly biosecurity and other pandemic-prevention measures going forward.
The findings are from new research produced by FAIRR — a global investor network supported by institutional investors managing assets of over $20 trillion, working to address ESG issues in protein supply chains.
In March, just as the WHO declared the coronavirus a pandemic, FAIRR released the FAIRR Climate Risk Tool™ — a first-of-its-kind tool to model the financial impacts of climate change on five leading meat firms and the animal protein sector at large. The tool forecast that the imminent physical impacts of climate change and the rapid and continuing growth of alternative proteins will put billions of dollars at risk for the sector.
Since then, we have been weathering the enormous economic and human health
shocks caused by COVID-19 — which, along with the travel
industry
and the sharing
economy,
have hit the meat industry particularly hard: Share prices of four of the US’
largest meat processors (JBS, Smithfield, Tyson and Sanderson
Farms) have plummeted 25 percent (versus the market at 9 percent); and
widespread meat plant
closures
led to Tyson Chairman John Tyson warning last month in a Washington
Post ad
that the “food chain is breaking.”
He’s not wrong: FAIRR’s An Industry Infected report finds that 73
percent of the world’s largest, listed animal protein producers (collectively
worth over $220 billion) score as “high risk” in its Pandemic Ranking. Due to their very nature (squeezing as many animals into as little
space as possible), CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations) or factory
farms create optimal conditions for cross contamination among animals — and
ultimately, for the workers who slaughter and process them. Combine that with
the widespread routine antibiotic use in the industry, which accounts for over
70 percent of antibiotic use worldwide: Antibiotic resistance has already posed
additional
challenges
in treating COVID-19 patients, and sector leadership is needed to prevent
antibiotic-resistant superbugs causing the next pandemic.
These producers’ poor performance across a set of seven criteria that are vital
to preventing future zoonotic pandemics — including worker safety, food
safety, deforestation and biodiversity management, animal welfare
and antibiotic stewardship — demonstrates that intensive animal production
is at serious risk of creating and spreading a future pandemic.
While none of the companies ranked qualified as “best practice” or “low risk,”
four of the five highest-ranked companies are from the aquaculture industry, due
to their stronger performance across all risk factors considered — particularly,
low risk in terms of antibiotic use, deforestation and biodiversity loss. Also,
unsurprisingly, the research points out that sales of plant-based alternatives
have continued to skyrocket across markets including the
US
and
China
during the pandemic; and some have been able to compete directly on price for
the first time.
FAIRR says that the Pandemic Ranking can inform investor conversations with
portfolio companies during and post COVID-19. The scores point to a clear lack
of best practice across ESG risk factors, many of which will be critical to
mitigating volatility and building resilience against possible future external
shocks, such as the next pandemic. Financial losses to the US cattle industry
have been predicted at more than $13 billion; and Jeff Currie, head of
commodities at Goldman Sachs, has listed livestock alongside oil as one of
the two most precarious commodities for investors next
year.
Read more about FAIRR’s Pandemic Ranking
here.
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sustainable Brands Staff
Published Jun 4, 2020 8am EDT / 5am PDT / 1pm BST / 2pm CEST