Published 2 years ago.
About a 8 minute read.
Image: Dr. Bronner's/Facebook
In this excerpt from his new book, Honor Thy Label, Dr. Bronner's Gero Leson shares the company's years-long journey to establishing a stable supply chain for fair trade, organic palm oil.
When Dr . Bronner’s decided, in 2005, to shift its major raw materials to organic and fair trade sources,
palm oil naturally had to be included. It accounted for some 10 percent of our agricultural
raw materials — and still does.
But by then, palm oil had become the devil’s oil. “You cannot produce
sustainable and fair palm oil,” is the conventional wisdom of many of our
activist allies, leaving consumers confused about the actual problems with the
crop and unsure of what to do about it.
“Why is Dr. Bronner’s still using palm oil? Because it’s so cheap?” some ask
“Don’t you know it’s destroying the rainforest and killing orangutans?” others
Truly sustainable businesses address the many interconnected social and environmental challenges that brands and their customers face — and strive for net-positive outcomes and impacts, in addition to growth. SB's latest guidebook can help your company navigate the path toward enhanced brand sustainability with key insights, actionable steps and a holistic framework that defines a roadmap for good growth.
If we wanted to give truthful answers to these questions, then building an
organic and fair supply for palm oil was particularly important. Our experience
over the last fifteen years now allows us to explain to customers and the world
at large what palm oil is, how it works, and what damage and benefits it can generate up and down a supply chain. Thanks to our “in house” production of FTO
(fair trade organic) palm oil, Dr. Bronner’s is in an excellent position to
demonstrate that it is not the oil itself that native people and environmental
NGOs fight against — for good reason — but rather the way it is generally grown:
in large monocultures on carelessly cleared forest land.
I always add that Dr. Bronner’s is not using our own palm oil from Ghana because
it’s cheap. Rather, as we joke, it’s one of the more expensive palm oils on the
planet — because we produce it in a fair and regenerative way that benefits our
host town, Asuom; its environs, and the planet at large in several significant
Why has palm oil become so successful and controversial? In short, its unique
composition of fatty acids offers diverse uses in processed goods at low cost.
Now, combine the versatility of palm oil with the economics of its production;
and the reason for its success becomes obvious. Of all oil crops, the oil palm
is the most productive, as measured by the output of oil per hectare. It
typically produces 5 MT of oil per hectare per year; compare that with canola,
soy, and sunflower, which all produce less than one MT per hectare per year.
High productivity and low maintenance requirements of oil palms make for
excellent economies of scale — in other words, the larger the plantation and the
mill, the lower your cost of producing a metric ton of palm oil.
Then, the clearcutting or burning of preexisting forests begins — with the
well-known, dreadful effects on people, animals, local environment and global
climate. National governments in tropical countries generally support such
aggressive development and accept its high social and environmental cost. They
are driven by the need to generate export revenues — and corruption between
private plantation developers and government decision-makers often plays a role.
There just isn’t the oversight or even the interest to protect unproductive
forest; it has no economic value except for those who live in it — and they have
In 2004, the largely uncontrolled sacrifice of forests and communities prompted
a collaboration of prominent producers and traders of palm oil, banks and
investors, major consumer brands, and NGOs. Named the Roundtable for
Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), it was aimed at jointly tackling a global
environmental problem and the growing criticism of palm oil by Western media and
consumers that threatened to halt the global growth of its consumption.
RSPO’s key mandate: Promote the production of “sustainable oil palm” through
credible and enforceable standards, effect improvements to setup and operation
of oil palm plantations, and engage with all stakeholders. Now, RSPO has more
than 4,500 members worldwide, representing all sectors of the palm oil value
chain, plus financing and NGOs.
In theory, the original RSPO standard ensured “sustainable” plantation
management, including minimization of uncontrolled soil movement and erosion. It
permitted only the “controlled” use of agrochemicals. It also required that
plantations employ “social accountability” and “transparency” when dealing with
its labor force, smallholder farmers and local communities.
NGOs first routinely denounced poor enforcement of standards on certified
plantations. Even many RSPO members were dissatisfied with
allowing continued deforestation. In response, RSPO adopted in late 2018 new
— strengthening its rules on deforestation, planting, labor, and land rights.
[Among other changes,] a standard for independent smallholders now regulates
their practices and the relationships between farmers and large palm oil mills.
So, is all well with big palm oil? Not quite. Past standard violations by RSPO
members — notably, large plantations — suggest an ongoing temptation to
sacrifice planet for profit. The larger, global concern is that still only some
20 percent of the world’s palm oil production is RSPO-certified. The balance
comes from plantations that are only regulated by their governments. Even worse,
in 2018, less than 50 percent of that amount was actually sold as
RSPO-certified. Both facts reflect poorly on the willingness of producers to
follow RSPO’s pragmatic
and of brands and consumers to pay a very modest price premium that even covers
the additional cost incurred by the producers to grow and mill RSPO palm oil.
This situation makes it unlikely that the topic of “sustainable palm oil” and
the smoke over Southeast
will disappear from the news anytime soon. Meanwhile, most trusted brands have
convinced their customers that RSPO-certified palm oil is as sustainable as it
So, why would Dr. Bronner’s start its own production of organic and fair trade
palm oil in Ghana? About half of the world’s palm fruits grow on small farms —
in Africa, even more than 60 percent. Unsurprisingly, their yields are only
about one-third of those of well-planted and maintained plantations. But that
can be changed — increasing yields through improved seedlings, farm maintenance,
and mixed agroforestry can expand global palm oil production without further clearing
This will not happen overnight, but even its possibility explains why Dr.
Bronner’s and other brands would pay a significant premium for an FTO palm oil
from such smallholder farms.
Because Dr. Bronner’s had decided in mid-2005 to “go fair trade,” we had made
good progress with our “clean supply chain.” David [Bronner] and I had
been looking for sources [of organic and fair palm oil], and the story was no
different from that for coconut and olive oil: Fair trade palm oil did not exist
because FLO had not developed a standard for palm
oil — and still hasn’t.
Luckily, we already knew that the Fair for Life
would soon offer a credible alternative. And so, as we had done with coconut oil, we began searching for existing organic palm oil projects willing to “go
fair trade” or, failing that, set up our own project.
With such low demand, no wonder there were, in 2006, worldwide only two relevant
certified organic palm oil suppliers: Daabon in Colombia and
AgroPalma in Brazil. They were plantation-based and Dr. Bronner’s had
bought organic palm oil from both. Yet neither operation ran a meaningful
smallholder program, and both seemed somewhat opportunistic about going fair
Fortunately, our network offered an alternative. …
It took three years to get there — but we now had an organic, fair, and
reasonably functional supply chain for some 300 MT per year of crude palm oil,
shipped in flexi-tanks to Holland for refining, and then to be used by Dr.
Bronner’s in soaps and by Rapunzel in its famous Tiger chocolate
As in all our projects, it took about two years for farmers to understand our
agenda: to pay fair prices that would make money for them while supporting
Many FTO projects that combine farming and processing struggle with
competitiveness. They benefit farmers and their communities; and create fair, safe and meaningful jobs. This raises their unit cost of
production on several fronts: higher prices of raw materials, higher wages and
benefits, higher overhead for professional staff, and non-production-related
expenses spread over a smallish output. Dr. Bronner’s and other third-party
customers will pay a premium over conventional or other “just organic” products.
As long, that is, as the product has an inherent value — such as supporting
fair, ecological, and effective development.
From Honor Thy Label: Dr. Bronner's Unconventional Journey to a Clean, Green,
and Ethical Supply Chain by Gero
Leson, to be published by Portfolio, an imprint of the Penguin Publishing Group,
a division of Penguin Random House, LLC. Copyright © 2021 by Gero Leson
Published Mar 9, 2021 10am EST / 7am PST / 3pm GMT / 4pm CET