Despite Climate-Related Damages, Insurers Lack Strategies

Only one out of eight insurers said they have in-depth climate change strategies, according to a recent survey by investor advocacy group Ceres.

Only one out of eight insurers said they have in-depth climate change strategies, according to a recent survey by investor advocacy group Ceres.

The report, titled “Insurer Climate Risk Disclosure Survey: 2012 Findings & Recommendations,” is based on 184 company disclosures responding to a climate risk survey created by insurance regulators in California, New York and Washington.

In 2012, insurance regulators in these three states began requiring insurers writing in excess of $300 million in direct premiums to make public their climate-related risks.

This year Ceres found only 23 companies have comprehensive climate change strategies, of which most are large, foreign-owned companies in the property and casualty, life and annuity, and health insurance sectors.

There was a remarkable diversity of views of climate science among those companies with comprehensive climate strategies, the report says. Companies such as ACE are funding primary climate change research and Swiss Re and others lend their brand to efforts at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Other companies, such as Allstate and Travelers, are more ambivalent about the existence of climate change and what is causing it.

Last year Ceres reported only 11 out of 88 insurers surveyed had solid climate change policies. While this year’s report questioned more firms, there was little change in the results — less than 13 percent of surveyed companies are making climate change a serious part of their business plans.

The insurance sector is a key driver of the economy and its lack of climate change preparedness could threaten both the economy and taxpayers, Ceres says.

Eleven extreme weather events in the U.S. each caused $1 billion or more in losses in 2012, the organization says. Hurricane Sandy inflicted $50 billion in damages, including tens of billions of insured losses by property and casualty companies that harmed quarterly profits. Losses sustained by the National Flood Insurance Program are being passed on to U.S. taxpayers, as well as the mounting cost of disaster relief spending.

While insurers may be lagging, a growing number of investors are showing concern over climate change. Last month, the Carbon Disclosure Project announced that investors representing a third of the world’s invested capital have asked more than 5,000 public companies to report carbon emissions and climate change strategies.

Upcoming Events

August 24-25, 2026
SB’26 Ōtautahi Christchurch
US Event
More Information

September 29-30, 2026
Sustainable Brands Türkiye’26
International Event

December 2-3, 2026
SB Member Network: Selling Sustainability and Shifting Consumer Demand and Behavior December Member Meeting
Member Event
More Information

Related Stories

Mobilizing Sectors for Sustainability: Why Industry Associations Are the Missing Link ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
Mobilizing Sectors for Sustainability: Why Industry Associations Are the Missing Link
From Spaghetti Bowl to Smart Mix: the Changing Role of Sustainability Standards ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
From Spaghetti Bowl to Smart Mix: the Changing Role of Sustainability Standards
Purpose at the Top — Where It Belongs BUSINESS CASE
Purpose at the Top — Where It Belongs
The Solution to Your Scope 3 Problem: Insetting, Explained SUPPLY CHAIN
The Solution to Your Scope 3 Problem: Insetting, Explained
From Words to Oversight: How Canada’s Largest Firms Measure Up on Social Purpose ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
From Words to Oversight: How Canada’s Largest Firms Measure Up on Social Purpose
Holding the Tension: How Sustainability Leaders Balance Urgency and Vision ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE
Holding the Tension: How Sustainability Leaders Balance Urgency and Vision