On the heels of the World Economic Forum’s release of its annual Global
Risks Report — of
which the biggest long-term
risk
remains a failure to act on climate change — comes another report that shows how
eliminating supply chain emissions would be a game changer in the global fight
against climate change.
Net-Zero Challenge: The Supply Chain
Opportunity,
published this week by the World Economic Forum and Boston Consulting
Group (BCG), analyzes the top eight global supply chains — which account for
more than 50 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions — and finds that
end-to-end decarbonization of these supply chains would add as little as 1-4
percent to end-consumer costs in the medium term. It also points to the global
nature of many supply chains, enabling companies to support decarbonization
across borders and in countries where governments do not yet prioritize climate
action.
We’ve seen a growing wave of commitments to address the climate crisis across
sectors; but, particularly, the private sector — with companies including
Burberry,
Google,
Kering,
Levi
Strauss,
Microsoft,
Natura,
PepsiCo,
Procter &
Gamble,
Target,
Unilever
and
Walmart,
to name a few — launching bold climate action plans in the past two years, with
all focusing much-needed attention on their Scope 3
emissions.
“We see the progression at CDP," says Dexter
Galvin, Global Director
Corporations and Supply Chains at CDP. “At the beginning, we mainly worked with
sustainability functions. But over time, this increasingly shifted out to
procurement teams as well — thinking about the full supply chain.”
The new report breaks down the major sources of emissions along each of the
eight major supply chains — food, construction, fashion,
fast-moving consumer goods, electronics, automotive, professional
services and freight — assesses the key levers to reducing emissions in
each supply chain; and shows that many can be easily deployed today, with very
little cost to implement.
Patrick Herhold, a report coauthor and managing director and partner at
BCG’s Centre for Climate Action, said: “The argument that costs are a major
barrier to reducing emissions is increasingly flawed — around 40 percent of the
emissions across the eight major supply chains we analyzed can be eliminated
with measures that bring cost savings or are at costs of less than €10 per ton
of CO2 equivalent. Increasing process efficiency and the use of recycled
materials, as well as buying more renewable power, provides companies with major
climate gains at very low costs.”
The opportunity for impact is especially high for consumer-facing companies,
whose supply chain emissions far outweigh their direct emissions from
manufacturing — P&G, for example, estimates that 85 percent of its
emissions
comes from consumer use of its products. These companies can use their buying
power to push for rapid decarbonization and help fund the transition by
co-investing with upstream raw-material producers, which struggle to finance the
transition alone.
Why isn’t supply chain decarbonization already being done on a wider scale? As
the report explains, a variety of factors have prevented companies from trying
to reduce emissions in their supply chains. One common problem is that many
companies are still working to gain transparency about these emissions in the
first place — and the mechanisms for establishing greater transparency at the
supplier level are still immature. This lack of transparency means the economics
of decarbonization are obscured, leading to the perception that optimizing for
sustainability may interfere with the goals of increasing performance or
lowering costs. More and more companies are forming partnerships and adopting
new
technologies
to gain visibility into the farthest reaches of their supply chains.
Read more findings from the report — including nine major actions that CEOs
should take today to address supply chain emissions —
here.
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sustainable Brands Staff
Published Jan 22, 2021 1pm EST / 10am PST / 6pm GMT / 7pm CET