It’s no secret that chocolate, arguably the world’s most popular sweet, has
a dark side.
Approximately 70 percent of cacao comes from just three countries —
Indonesia, and Ghana and Cote D’Ivoire in West Africa — with
most of the remainder grown in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Regardless of region, conventional cultivation of this lucrative crop has
created increasing challenges for brands on several fronts:
-
Since the early 2000s, revelations about the prevalence of child and forced
labor on
cacao farms — driven primarily by low prices paid to farmers — have created
challenges for brands. In West Africa alone, an estimated 1.5 million
children
were working on smallholder cacao plantations.
-
Conventional practices for harvesting and drying cacao have recently been
linked to high levels of heavy
metals
including lead and
cadmium
in chocolate brands around the world, regardless of quality.
-
Increasing droughts, heatwaves and flooding in cacao-growing regions have
damaged crops and caused chocolate prices to spike as much as 400
percent
in recent years — leading to projections that soon, farmers won’t be able to
produce enough cacao to meet consumer demand.
With chocolate companies raking in roughly $130 billion in global retail
sales
in 2024, the industry is deeply invested in finding a way to continue satisfying
the world’s sweet tooth well into the future.
Climate-proofing chocolate
While there have been a few promising discoveries that could eventually help increase the
climate resilience of cacao
crops,
more and more innovators are looking to achieve this by taking cacao out of the
equation — fermenting everything from fava beans
and sunflower seeds to barley and
carob
to concoct more sustainable, cacao-free “chocolate.” Another growing number of
startups
— including Davis-based California
Cultured — is cultivating more sustainable,
contaminant-free alternatives in a lab from cacao cells.
As CEO Alan Perlstein told
Sustainable Brands®, “Child slavery has gotten worse, not better,
over the last 20 years; moreover, extreme weather is resulting in significant
climate effects that are devastating cacao yields. What we're trying to do is
create this platform to grow these tropical ingredients in a more sustainable
and efficient way that saves on power, equipment and capex costs.”
To Perlstein, the current system of growing and transporting cacao
around the world to make into chocolate is unsustainable from a social, climate
and financial perspective — both for farmers and brands alike:
-
Climate change is likely to only get worse, which means less predictable —
and potentially lower-quality — cacao production, which stands to hit brands
right in the profits.
-
Consistent global popularity of chocolate and other cacao products has
failed to improve farmer
livelihoods,
and Fair
Trade
and other sustainable
certifications
lack the consistency and scale to have the necessary impact.
-
Brands are under increasing pressure from both
consumers
and
regulators
to ensure their chocolate products don’t cause social or environmental harm.
Industry support
One key difference between lab-made cacao and cultivated alternatives to other
foods linked to unsustainable practices — including
meat,
dairy
and palm
oil?
As opposed to the pushback innovators in the alternative-protein
space
face as the meat industry spreads
fears
about nutrition and lobbies for stricter
labeling
regulations and outright
bans,
“Big Chocolate” is on board with what companies such as California Cultured are
trying to do.
“We've been feeling a huge pull,” Perlstein says. “Everyone just wants this as
quick as possible. And that means the industry is worried about the supply and
quality of chocolate and wants to be on the cutting edge of innovation.”
But not everyone is sold on the sustainability credentials of lab-grown food
alternatives — with critics expressing concern about production
emissions.
Furthermore, a shift to cultured alternatives could further endanger
smallholder
livelihoods
— and it could take away from the real work
non-profits
and
brands
have done to prove that sustainable supply chains are possible.
Perlstein feels local production will always be better than
long, complex, difficult-to-trace supply chains.
“I believe the future of many of the foods that we're going to eat will,
hopefully, be produced more locally — with not only better environmental
practices but labor practices, as well,” he says.
Poised to scale
California Cultured hopes to receive a green light from the FDA that would
clear the path towards selling its cacao to US chocolate lovers within a
year. In the meantime, a recent
partnership
with Meiji — one of Japan’s
largest chocolate producers — means its cultivated cacao powder could be on
Japanese shelves as soon as next year.
But the challenge facing all players in the alternative commodity space is how
to scale while ensuring consistent quality and reducing costs. The failure to do
so is one reason that plant-based meat has seen sales
stagnate
and
fall
in recent years. But for cacao, the reality of climate change is increasing the
urgent need for viable alternatives.
“There are more diseases than ever before, and the climate is just making it
exponentially worse,” Perlstein asserted. “That's why we're spending so much
time and effort trying to develop a new supply chain for one of the world's most
favorite foods.”
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Media, Campaign and Research Consultant
Nithin is a freelance writer who focuses on global economic, and environmental issues with an aim at building channels of communication and collaboration around common challenges.
Published Jul 2, 2025 8am EDT / 5am PDT / 1pm BST / 2pm CEST