If you believed everything you read in the media, you might
be mourning the demise of corporate diversity, equity and
inclusion
(DEI) efforts in the US. But a number of moves in recent months suggest the
real story is more complicated, more nuanced – and far from over.
The latest GlobeScan
poll,
offering an appropriately timed temperature check of US consumer sentiment on
a range of corporate responsibility issues, highlights robust bipartisan
support for corporate action on both climate and DEI
issues.
In fact, 72 percent of respondents say companies should have commitments to DEI
in spite of headwinds from a rather unsupportive
administration.
This flies in the face of narratives claiming US consumers are turning against
corporate diversity programs. And it may explain why some companies are facing
criticism – not for supporting DEI, but for backing away from
it.
The risks of fair-weather values
Yes, the backlash to the backlash is real — and it’s putting brands at a new
crossroads: how to maintain inclusive policies without becoming the next
lightning rod. Some are doubling down. Others are rebranding. And a few are
learning the hard way that trying to please everyone might please no one.
The ROI of Sustainability, Part 2: Sources of Financial Value and Effectively Communicating Analyses
Join us Thurs, July 24, for Part 2 of our Masterclass on the ROI of Sustainability! Leaders from Natura, NYU Stern Center for Sustainable Business, Point B and Valutus will dive into ROI techniques you can apply right away, real-world examples that bring said techniques to life, and time-tested ways to communicate the ROI results of sustainability.
Retail giant Target is a good case in point. The
company was once held up as a leader in DEI, with strong internal
goals
and a raft of public-facing initiatives that had everybody talking and people
queuing up in support. Then, in 2023, amid conservative boycotts and political
pressure, the firm began quietly rowing back its DEI commitments – shifting away
from inclusive hiring goals and dialing back LGBTQ+ merchandise displays in
stores across the country.
The response? Backlash from the other side. Consumers and advocacy groups alike
criticized the
move
as a betrayal of the very communities Target once celebrated. Social media lit
up with disappointment. Employee
morale
reportedly took a hit. And now, competing retailers including
Costco could be reaping the
rewards.
It’s not that Costco made a strategic decision to dodge the DEI debate. It has
simply remained consistent with its approach to inclusion and diversity, quietly
sticking to its
principles
without launching flashy campaigns or having to backpedal in the face of
perceived antipathy towards DEI. The payoff? A boost to consumer goodwill and
reputational strength. While Target continues to navigate controversy, Costco is
seen as a stable, values-driven brand. In a time when customers are increasingly
savvy about performative
allyship,
that consistency matters.
Adapting, not retreating
Meanwhile, there has been a similar DEI showdown over at
Disney. In March, an anti-DEI shareholder
proposal aimed at derailing the company’s support for LGBTQ+ initiatives was
overwhelmingly
rejected.
It wasn’t just a win for DEI advocates; it was a clear signal that investors –
many of whom are often cast as wary of so-called ‘woke capitalism’ – see value
in inclusive practices. Disney’s position reflects a growing understanding that
DEI isn’t just a moral imperative; it's a business one.
Other companies are finding clever ways to navigate the polarized landscape.
PepsiCo recently announced it would move away from
the language of ‘DEI’ and instead emphasize “inclusion for
growth.”
According to reports, the shift aims to avoid political entanglement while still
pursuing the same internal goals. It’s a reframing strategy – less about
changing the work, more about changing how it’s talked about. The question now
is whether this semantic pivot will work. Will critics accept the rebranding?
Will employees and communities still see the company as an ally?
“The rebranding can be either strategic or superficial,”
Futerra co-founder and Chief Solutionist
Solitaire Townsend tells
Sustainable Brands® (SB). “‘Inclusion for growth’ could be a smart move
if it helps embed DEI deeper into core business strategy. But if it’s just a new
label to dodge controversy while quietly cutting back, people will see right
through it. And your employees will definitely know.”
Why are so many brands struggling with their DEI identities? Part of it is
timing. DEI became a corporate focus in 2020, when companies made bold promises
to support racial
justice. But
the US political climate has since shifted: Conservative activists and
politicians
have made DEI a target, accusing companies of ‘reverse discrimination’ and
overreach.
That pressure has led to a wave of second-guessing and, in some cases, retreat.
The ROI of standing your ground
But research continues to show the business case for cultivating diverse and
inclusive corporate
cultures:
Inclusive companies are more innovative, attract better talent, better reflect
and engage their customer
base
and weather reputational storms more effectively.
The business case hasn’t changed. What’s changed is the level of scrutiny – and
the need for companies to show that DEI isn’t just a buzzword but baked into
culture and operations.
Another company that continues to stand its
ground
is outdoor apparel brand REI. According to Director of
Workforce DEI & Belonging Kristin
Rodney, the long-term value of the
company’s Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) commitments
“shows up everywhere.”
“Centering the voices and experiences of our employees is key to our approach,”
she tells SB. “We conduct regular surveys, seek input from our five employee-led
Inclusion Networks and our Co-op Compass Group to learn about our employees’
experiences and what matters to them.”
Nicole Lacasse, the co-op’s
Senior Manager of Brand and Customer REDI, adds that “success in inclusive
design
has already shown measurable short-term impacts – from increased product sales
to higher attendance at inclusive community events.”
In the short term, more companies may follow PepsiCo’s lead: pivoting language,
adjusting optics, but keeping the core. Others seem likely to stick to their
guns, like Disney and Costco. There’s also a growing emphasis on substance over
statement. Flashy campaigns or Pride Month
tie-ins
are no longer enough. Today’s consumers and employees are asking deeper
questions: What are your pay equity numbers? Who’s in leadership? What’s your
supplier diversity strategy?
“Ultimately, truly effective DEI work moves at the speed of trust. When we show
up consistently, listen deeply and make belonging a shared responsibility, we
strengthen our brand and co-op community,” Lacasse tells us.
Brands that treat DEI as a political liability will likely continue to face
headwinds from both sides. Those that stay consistent – and transparent – will
build longer-term trust.
“Scaling back our commitments would fundamentally contradict who we are,”
Lacasse adds. “Inclusion isn’t a political stance for us; it’s a strategic and
moral imperative.”
The DEI conversation isn’t ending. It’s evolving. Companies are being forced to
sharpen their strategies, clarify their values, and own their decisions –
whether that means standing firm, rebranding smartly or facing the consequences
of retreat.
“DEI isn’t just a nice-to-have. It’s becoming core to risk management,
innovation and business continuity,” Townsend asserts. “The companies that
rolled back DEI are already suffering more than those sticking to their
principles. The market will take note.”
The backlash to the backlash is a reminder: DEI isn’t a fad or a PR stunt; it’s
a reflection of the world as it is, and the world consumers want to see.
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Tom is founder of storytelling strategy firm Narrative Matters — which helps organizations develop content that truly engages audiences around issues of global social, environmental and economic importance. He also provides strategic editorial insight and support to help organisations – from large corporates, to NGOs – build content strategies that focus on editorial that is accessible, shareable, intelligent and conversation-driving.
Published Jun 23, 2025 8am EDT / 5am PDT / 1pm BST / 2pm CEST