Luxury has a terrible reputation.
It starts with the word: The etymology
of the word remains rooted in the notion of excess.
And excess does reign — from the air miles involved in the annual cycle of
fashion “weeks” (perhaps permanently disrupted by
COVID) to the world of
yachts and eye-popping shopping excursions carried on in private, on Instagram,
or in shows such as “The Real Housewives” or "Bling
Empire.”
But in recent years, luxury companies — led by fashion houses and brands — have
upped their game on many matters ESG; in some cases, because of a sense of
internal purpose, as a result of activism, or as a result of the numerous
surveys that point to the luxury consumer as caring about
luxury. Gucci is
noted for its activism and the relative transparency on supply
chains. Stella
McCartney is a long-time campaigner for ethical fashion, eschewing leather and
pioneering new biomaterials such
as Mylo, made from mycelium. And
luxury holding companies such as Kering (Gucci’s parent company)
and LVMH have
both developed sustainability
strategies
for a cornucopia of initiatives including greenhouse emissions and supply chain
tracing; as well as commitments to
biodiversity,
animal welfare, and of course, workers’ rights.
The changing luxury consumer
Circularity by Design: How to Influence Sustainable Consumer Behaviors
Join us Thursday, December 5, at 1pm ET for a free webinar on making circular behaviors the easy choice! Nudge & behavioral design expert Sille Krukow will explore the power of Consumer Behavior Design to drive circular decision-making and encourage behaviors including recycling and using take-back services. She will share key insights on consumer psychology, behavior design related to in-store and on-pack experiences, and how small changes in the environment can help make it easy for consumers to choose circularity.
Despite (or because of) the reputation for profligacy, research has shown that
luxury consumption does indeed create a sense of guilt among luxury
consumers.
And on the more positive side, numerous surveys from firms such
as Bain and Boston Consulting Group have
indicated that luxury consumers care about sustainability, purpose, and impact.
In fact, many have already demonstrated commitment to doing good through
philanthropy.
In addition, like the rest of us, the long pandemic lockdowns gave many luxury
consumers more opportunity to reassess their values. Social issues such as
Black Lives
Matter
exploded. The environmental causes of the pandemic were endlessly discussed. The
risks of climate change were made ever more evident with wildfires in the West.
And people — luxury consumers included — swarmed to outdoor recreation areas
and
activities
and fell in love with nature.
In response, prayer trended and people searched for
purpose.
And during the pandemic, philanthropy among the Ultra High Net Worth
accelerated (when
compared to recessions, for example). Sarah Willersdorf, global head of
luxury at Boston Consulting Group,
said:
“COVID was the first time that a lot of people realized that their individual
actions have societal consequences.”
Much of the pandemic response merely continued consumers’ search for meaning and
happiness that was trending pre-pandemic. In particular, social psychologists
have long widely believed that having a sense of purpose and broader
service
is one of the foundations of happiness. Amplified by the pandemic, we see this
trend continuing long into the future.
Gaining additional insight through social listening
It’s one thing to answer that one values sustainability and social
responsibility when prompted in a survey. It’s another to actively engage with
it.
As a company that tracks the Modern Luxury Consumer, we set out to discover
whether luxury consumers did so in the only way you can without resorting to
surveys or extensive ethnographic studies: social listening. We listened across
multiple sectors, ranging from
travel
to fashion to home and lifestyle.
Social listening is an evolving way of gaining customer insight, often used in
conjunction with traditional surveys. Even the most unbiased surveys tend to
prompt respondents into giving an opinion, while social listening is a far more
organic tool — which merely “listens” for insights gathered from the millions of
breadcrumbs consumers scatter across the web detailing their experiences,
viewpoints and personal perspectives. While considered “alternative data,” it is
a vast dataset, expanding exponentially, and often overlooked or underutilized.
Our “listening” partner, social listening expert Metric Centric, used a
process that combines data and human analytics: It “crawls” the open web (not
just social channels), then combines that information with industry research and
audience data. Analysts filter massive amounts of data to pull out the key
insights and review sentiment, comments, issues, problems and ideas “heard” for
contextual meaning. The analysts then develop scorecard summary analyses of
trends and key findings that allow business managers to fully understand
audience segments, influencers and public opinion.
What luxury consumers talk about
We wanted to understand the extent to which values — in particular,
sustainability and social responsibility — played a role in consumers'
conversations about luxury purchases.
In a nutshell, we discovered that despite survey claims that sustainability and
social purpose were important to them, Modern Luxury Consumers rarely mentioned
it in the context of shopping decisions. In fact, they rarely mentioned it at
all.
Given that kind of finding, it might be tempting to conclude that luxury
consumers only say they care about sustainability and social responsibility
when prompted, but that’s not the whole story.
Modern Luxury consumers did engage intensively but ONLY when prompted to do so
via news reports, etc. Organic online commentary around the topic was low, but
discussions increased when brands themselves or — much more likely — industry
media highlighted CSR efforts.
It appears that more of the conversation is sparked by business press than by
consumer press, with much of the conversation being had by executives,
journalists and marketers.
Sustainability was a big driver in positive conversations around luxury
brands, indicating that it does have a significant effect on brand reputation.
Social responsibility and sustainability had distinctly different profiles:
sustainability is “safer” than “social responsibility.” Unsurprisingly (and
consistent with the survey findings), Millennial and Gen Z luxury consumers were
more engaged, particularly when it came to social responsibility.
“Sustainability” resonated relatively more strongly with older luxury
consumers.
Social equity-related issues (BLM, the
election)
created conversational intensity. They drove a much higher volume of comments
(300 percent) than sustainability issues, indicating a higher connection to
“human” issues than “environmental” issues (though of course, these two are
highly intertwined). Unsurprisingly, social equity issues were highly polarizing
and resonated significantly more positively with younger consumers (Gen Z,
Millennials) than older ones.
Traditional and business news sources such as Business of
Fashion, Vogue Runway,
Luxury Daily, and NYT Style (amplified by social) drove
conversation around sustainability; while social media was the native platform
for conversation about social issues.
Why is this?
On one hand, consumers say (in surveys) they want to engage with sustainable,
purpose-driven
brands.
Pandemic and post-pandemic
behavior
do indicate an increased sense of purpose (or search there for) on the part of
consumers. But they don’t necessarily share those views with their networks and
don’t engage with those issues, unless prompted.
So, what gives — particularly when it comes to values? Is it just that surveyed
consumers believe they should say that they care — when in fact, it’s not top
of mind, in most cases? We believe that’s partially — but not universally —
true. There are several other reasons:
-
Brand silence. Many luxury brands include sustainability and social
responsibility as part of their mission and operating ethos, but don’t do
more to elucidate or engage consumers. This is because luxury — with its
aura of excess — has been reticent to talk to consumers about the broader
CSR issues, concerned (quite rightfully) about attracting charges of
“greenwashing.”
-
Sustainability has become table-stakes. Luxury consumers could already
believe that their favorite brands are doing the right thing when it comes
to the environment, even if those brands don’t talk about it.
-
Sustainability is too confusing for most consumers. Sustainability isn’t
just hard to talk about — it’s hard to understand. There are so many
competing standards and accreditation platforms, there are so many nuances
and tradeoffs (e.g. Is carbon reduction “better” than carbon offsets? Is
using recycled water in production better than recycling?) — the answer to
which is often: It depends. Consumers — even more educated ones — who have
a hard enough time deciding between steel gray and graphite don’t have the
patience to go through reports and analyses of environmental statements. And
if they don’t have the patience, they won’t know what to say to each other
about it on social media.
-
Sustainability has been joined — or even usurped — by social
justice. Younger consumers expect their brands to be much more “woke” —
looking to them to be a part of, and even lead social
change.
This is part of a long-standing trend of Millennial and Gen Z consumers
embracing ethics and values as a key part of brand and purchase decisions.
For older generations, unused to seeing corporations take political stands,
negativity is understandable.
But the trend is clear: CEOs have taken note of the desires of their future
markets. After an uncomfortable time for many in the wake of Black Lives
Matter, CEOs from a wide range of industries are joining together to
support voter rights and
access
in response to consumers, employees, shareholders and activists.
What are the implications for luxury brands?
Whether it’s sustainability or social activism, luxury brands will have to
contend with issues related to corporate social responsibility: It’s in the
zeitgeist, and much more. However, there is no “one size fits all” strategy for
doing so. Instead, here are five principles on which to base positioning and
customer engagement strategy.
-
First, do no harm. Avoid greenwashing, avoid virtue signaling. Tell the
truth. Walk the walk before you talk the talk. And remember, it’s never the
truth that does a company in, it’s the cover-up.
-
Understand your brand and its purpose. Every brand has a purpose — a
reason and a way of being. Understand yours, and understand what it means in
the context of sustainability and social responsibility. Starting with your
brand purpose ensures that it is and feels true to your brand.
-
Identify your social archetype — where you position your brand affects
what you do, how you engage and engage with your customers, and how you
will stand out from the competition: each presents significant opportunities
and potential pitfalls. At Collective
Work, we have found that there are four
primary archetypes:
a. The Activist: Examples: Patagonia, Ben and Jerry’s
b. The Educator: Examples: Stella McCartney, Six Senses
c. The Social Business: Examples: The Real Real, Yerdle, Warby Parker
d. The Operator: Examples: Kering, IHG, Estee Lauder Companies
-
Know what resonates with your customers — but don’t pander. There’s
nothing worse than brands that chase every social cause: they dilute their
purpose and voice and risk turning off customers. Pick the causes —
particularly when it comes to social justice and responsibility — where you
can make an impact, and find thoughtful ways to create change — not just
talk about it.
-
Understand the model of influence — and act accordingly. The Collective
Work x Metric Centric social listening project shows that sustainability and
social responsibility each has a distinctive model of influence — what moves
the needle in terms of opinion, where that influence takes place, and even
the kind of content necessary for it. Create roadmaps and plans based on
those models, and keep listening as the world of corporate social
responsibility evolves.
Purpose, values, sustainability and social responsibility are here to stay as
modern luxury consumers consider their choices. For some consumers, these
factors will alleviate guilt and make them feel better about their purchases:
They won’t drive purchases, but they could well alleviate guilt — and create
greater brand affinity.
For others — particularly younger luxury consumers — these factors are all
important. In fact, enrolling customers in social and environmental causes
could even create greater brand loyalty — helping the customer transform
themselves into better citizens.
“Being your best self” is the essence of luxury. Values and purpose — whatever
form they take — are thus luxury essentials, not just nice-to-haves.
Get the latest insights, trends, and innovations to help position yourself at the forefront of sustainable business leadership—delivered straight to your inbox.
Regina Connell is the founder of Collective Work, a research consultancy specializing in the Modern Luxury Consumer and ecosystem that surrounds them.
Published Apr 23, 2021 2pm EDT / 11am PDT / 7pm BST / 8pm CEST